Notes

1. . Malcolm L.Diamond, “Contemporary Analysis: The Metaphysical Target and the Theological VictimJournal of Religion  47 (1967): 210–32.
2. . Ibid., p. 230.
3. . E.g., see many of the articles in the special Whitehead issue of Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. 7 (Winter 1969–70), or in Process Studies; also the articles by Robert Palter, MiličČapek, and Sewall Wright in Process and ivinity: Philosophical Essays Presented to Charles Hartshorne, ed. William L. Reese and Eugene Freeman (La Salk, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1964), and Abner Shimony's “Quantum Physics and the Philosophy of Whitehead,” in Philosophy in America, ed. Max Black (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965). Some important, book‐length studies are: Robert Palter, Whitehead's Philosophy of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961); J. M. Burgers, Experience and Conceptual Activity (Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1965); Donald W. Sherburne, A Whiteheadian Aesthetic: Some Implications of Whitehead's Metaphysical Speculation (New Haven, Conn.: Archon Books, 1970); Paul F. Schmidt, Perception and Cosmology in Whitehead's hilosophy (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1967).
4. . Alfred North Whitehead, Modes of Thought (New York.: Capricorn Books, 1958), p. 164.
5. . Alfred North Whitehead, Adventure's of Ideas (New York: Macmillan Co., 1933), p. 281, and Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (New York: Macmillan Co., 1967), p. 43. Unless otherwise specified, all cited references are by Whitehead.
6. . Adventures of Ideas, pp. 288, 290.
7. . Ibid., p. 290.
8. . Process and Reality, p. 241.
9. . Ibid.
10. . Ibid., p. 245.
11. . Science and the Modern World (New York: Macmillan Co., 3927), pp. 75, 77.
12. . Process and Reality, p. 83.
13. . Adventures of Ideas, pp. 231–33; Process and Reality, p. 174.
14. . Process and Reality, p. 271.
15. . Adventures of Ideas, p. 289.
16. . Process and Reality, p. 180.
17. . Ibid., p. 252.
18. . Adventures of Ideas, p. 284.
19. . Science and the Modern World, p. 107.
20. . Process and Reality, pp. 181–82.
21. . Science and the Modern World, p. 107.
22. . Modes of Thought, pp. 156–59.
23. . David Hume, An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1956), pp. 75–76 (sec. 7: “Of the Idea of Necessary Connection”).
24. . George Santayana, Scepticism and Animal Faith: Introduction to a System of Philosophy (New York: Dover Publications, 1955), pp. 15, 17 (cited by Whitehead in Process and Reality, p. 240, and in Symbolism: Its Meaning and Effect [New York: Capricorn Books, 1955], pp. 29, 31).
25. . Process and Reality, p. 204; my emphasis.
26. . David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby‐Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968). bk. 1, pt. 2. sec. 5.
27. . Process and Reality, p. 213.
28. . Ibid., p. 267.
29. . Ibid., p. 265.
30. . Ibid., pp. 265–66.
31. . Ibid., p. 182.
32. . Ibid., pp. 255–79.
33. . Ibid., pp. 28–29, 35, 173–84, 361–65; Adventures of Ideas, pp. 235, 239, 241, 243.
34. . Process and Reality, p. 236. 417
35. . Ibid., pp. 363–64.
36. . Ibid., p. 95.
37. . Ibid., p. 102.
38. . Ibid., p. ix.
39. . Ibid., p. 38.
40. . Ibid., p. 33.
41. . Adventures of Ideas, p. 305.
42. . Ibid., p. 227.
43. . Process and Reality, pp. 44, 71, 125, passim.
44. . Ibid., p. 130.
45. . Ibid., p. 52.
46. . Ibid., p. 365.
47. . Ibid., p. 247.
48. . Adventures of Ideas, p. 233.
49. . Ibid., pp. 234–35.
50. . Ibid., p. 247.
51. . Ibid., pp. 250–51; my emphasis.
52. . Interpretation of Science, ed. A. H. Johnson (Indianapolis: Bobbs‐Merrill Co., 1961). p. 218.
53. . Science and the Modern World, p. 136; cf. Modes of Thought, p. 150.
54. . Process and Reality, p. 254.
55. . Modes of Thought, p. 149.
56. . Ibid., p. 159.
57. . Ibid., p. 161.
58. . Process and Reality, p. 517.
59. . Modes of Thought, p. 28.
60. . Process and Reality, pp. 524, 527, 531.
61. . Modes of Thought, p. 151.
62. . Process and Reality, p. 4.
63. . Lord Brain, “The Neurological Approach,” in Perception and the External World, ed. R. J. Hirst (New York: Macmillan Co., 1965), p. 46.
64. . E.g., V. C. Chapell, “Whitehead's Theory of Becoming,” in Alfred North Whitehead: Essays on His Philosophy, ed. George Kline (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall, 1963), pp. 70–80. Chapell is shown to have missed much of the point by David Sipfle in “On the Intelligibility of the Epochal Theory of TimeMonist  53 (1969): 505–18. Another writer, on whom Chapell seems to have relied for some of his understanding of Whitehead, is Adolf Grunbaum. For Grunbaum's understanding of Whitehead see his Philosophical Problems of Space and Time (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1963), esp. pp. 4E‐65 and chaps. 12, 15. Grunbaum says that Whitehead gives a “perceptualistic version” of the intrinsic measurability of time based on the “deliverance of sense,” which he clearly takes to be “sense perception”; cf. pp. 48–49. But this is to miss half–the more important half–of Whiteheads analysis. Also, C. I. Lewis has shown that Whitehead's defense of the intrinsic measurability of time is not at all based on so contingent a matter as the deliverance of sense but is securely grounded in the analysis of fundamental events or actual occasions (see “The Categories of Natural Knowledge,” in The Philosophy 4 Alfred North Whitehead, ed. Paul Arthur Schillp, 2d ed. [New York: Tudor Publishing Co., 1951 1, pp. 701–44). For a more recent misreading of Whitehead see Adolf Grünbaum, Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes (Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1967), pp. 52–55. Here Grunbaum associates “perception” with “acts of consciousness”; thus “perceptual time” is said to be “mind‐dependent,” and so physical events are thought to be “tenseless.” Of course, if one insists that perception requites “mind,” the outcome is inevitable. But this, clearly, is to have missed nearly all of Whitehead's analysis of perception.
65. . Charles Hartshorne, Creative Synthesis and Philosophic Method (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1970), chap. 16.
66. . See esp. Adventures of Idea, pt. 4.
67. . Process and Reality, p. 4.