Notes

1. . Karl R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, rev. ed. (London: Hutchinson, 1968). P. 15.
2. . Thomas F. Torrance, Theological Science (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), pp. 121 and 125.
3. . Hugo, Adam Bedau, “Complementarity and theRelation between Science and Religion,” Zygon  9 (1974): 202–24.
4. . Ibid., p. 206.
5. . Ibid., p. 207.
6. . Ibid.
7. . Ibid., p. 209.
8. . Ibid.
9. . Ibid.
10. . Ibid., p. 215.
11. . D. M. MacKay,' 9 (1974): 225.
12. . Ibid.
13. . Ibid., p. 226.
14. . Ibid., p. 225.
15. . Ibid., p. 227.
16. . Ibid., p. 229.
17. . Ibid., p. 230.
18. . Ibid.
19. . Ibid., p. 240.
20. . Ibid.
21. . Ernst Cassirer, “Einstein's Theory of Relativity,” in his Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity (New York: Dover Publication, Inc., 1953), p. 379.
22. . G. E. Moore, Philosophical Studies (Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1968), p. 288.
23. . Charles Hartshorne, The Divine Relativity: A Social C0nceptw.n of God (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1964), p. 103.
24. . RichardSchlegel, “Quantum Physics and Human Purpose,” Zygon  8 (1973): 200.