Abstract
Abstract. John V. Apczynski, while presenting a helpful analysis of Wolfhart Pannenberg and Michael Polanyi, does not succeed in showing that Pannenberg's theology is incoherent. Contrary to Apczynski, I hold that Pannenberg's concern for theoretic assertions is not extrinsic but intrinsic and central to his program. Moreover, this concern does not rest directly upon the cultural dominance of impersonal knowing but is a countering of the theological overreaction against it. Polanyi has pioneered the critique of impersonal knowledge, but in Pannenberg's judgment much theology tends to espouse too cheaply the Polanyian elevation of faith as ground of knowing. Pannenberg, while appreciating the relative justification of Polanyi's work, is attempting to thematize afresh—in interesting contrast to Polanyi and, for instance, Paul Tillich—the public, rational structure of faith.
How to Cite
Foster, D.,
(1982) “PANNENBERGS POLANYIANISM: A RESPONSE TO JOHN V. APCZYNSKI”,
Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 17(1),
75–81.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1982.tb00968.x
Rights
© 2024 The Author(s).