Notes

  1. . Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modem World (1925; New York: Mentor Books, 1964), 11. 162.
  2. . Any comprehensive list of process theologians would inevitably include, among others, the names of John B. Cobb, Jr., David Griffin, Charles Hartshorne, Schubert M. Ogden, Daniel Day Williams, and of course Alfred North Whitehead. For excerpts from major works in process theology see Delwin Brown, Ralph E. James, Jr., and Gene Reeves, eds., Process Philosophy and Christian Thought (Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs‐Merrill Co., 1971). See also articles in the journal Process Studies, ed. Lewis S. Ford (Claremont, Calif.: Process Studies, 1971‐).
  3. . RichardSchlegel, “Quantum Physics and Human Purpose,” Zygon  8 (SeptemberDecember 1973): 200–20. Compare my own remarks in George Arkell Riggan, “Epilogue to the Symposium on Science and Human Purpose,” Zygon  8 (SeptemberDecember 1973): 448–51.
  4. . Roberto Colella, A. W. Overhauser, and S. A. Werner have used a nuclear reactor and a neutron interferometer at the University of Michigan to demonstrate in a single experiment both the gravitational and the wave‐interference effects of neutrons. For reference to the experiment see “Falling Quanta,” Scientific American 234 (January 1976): 61–62.
  5. . Compare Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality (New York: Macmillan, 1929), pp. 141, 53–54, 121–22.
  6. . Compare Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality (New York: Macmillan, 1929), p. 139.
  7. . Compare Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality (New York: Macmillan, 1929), pp. 27–28.
  8. . Whitehead uses “actual occasion” as a synonym for “actual entity” chiefly when its extensiveness has some direct relevance to the discussion–either temporal extension (i.e., duration), spatial extension, or both. Compare Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality (New York: Macmillan, 1929), p. 119.
  9. . Ibid., pp. 136–41.
  10. . Ibid., pp. 165–67.
  11. . Ibid., pp. 139–40.
  12. . Ibid., p. 141.
  13. . Ibid., pp. 28, 29.
  14. . Ibid., pp. 113, 119, 124.
  15. . Ibid., pp. 113–14, 124. Cf. also pp. 127–67. 431–508.
  16. . Ibid., p. 136. Cf. also p. 234.
  17. . Ibid., p. 213.
  18. . Ibid., p. 334.
  19. . Ibid., p. 43.
  20. . Ibid., p. 337. Cf. also p. 35.
  21. . Ibid., p. 35.
  22. . Ibid., p. 35, 246, 262.
  23. . Ibid., p. 29.
  24. . Ibid., p. 335. Cf. “category of explanation” xxii, p. 33.
  25. . Ibid., pp. 335–36.
  26. . Ibid., pp. 29–80.
  27. . Ibid., p. 74.
  28. . Ibid., pp. 196–97.
  29. . On the self‐creation of actual entities, cf. “category of explanation” xxii, ibid., p. 39, passim.
  30. . Ibid., p. 41. Cf'. also p. 74.
  31. . Cf. ibid., pp.41, 75.
  32. . Cf. “category of explanation” xxiii, ibid., p. 38. Cf. also p. 43.
  33. . Ibid., p. 75.
  34. . Ibid.
  35. . Ibid., p. 74.