Amsterdamski, S.. 1975. “Troubles with the Problem of Demarcation  ,” chap. 2 of Between Experience and Metaphysics: Philosophical Problems of the Evolution of Science. Dordrecht , Holland : Reidel.

Anonymous. 1819. Essay Review of T. G. Gisborne, The Testimony of Natural Theology to Christianity. Quarterly Review  21:48–49.

Ayer, A. J., ed. 1959. Logical Positivism. Glencoe , Ill. : Free Press.

Bartley, W. W.. 1984. “Logical Strength and Demarcation  . In Rationality in Science and Politics, ed. G.Andersson, 69–93. Dordrecht , Holland : Reidel.

Bridgman, P. W.. 1927. The Logic of Modern Physics. London : Macmillan.

Bridgman, P. W.. 1936. The Nature of Physical Theory. Princeton , N.J. : Princeton Univ. Press.

Bridgman, P. W.. 1950. Reflections of a Physicist. New York : Philosophical Books.

Bridgman, P. W.. 1959. The Way Things Are. Cambridge , Mass. : Harvard Univ. Press.

Brody, B. A., ed. 1970. Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs , N.J. : Prentice–Hall.

Comte, A.. 183042. Cours de Philosophic Positive. 6 vols. 2d ed. Paris : Bachelier.

Comte, A.. 1974. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. New York : AMS Press.

Conze, E.. 1935. The Scientific Method of Thinking: An Introduction to Dialectical Materialism. London : Chapman & Hall.

Cornforth, M.. 1977. The Open Philosophy and the Open Society: A Reply to Sir Karl Popper's Refutations of Marxism. 2d ed. London : Lawrence and Wishart.

Dolby, R. G. A.. 1979. “Classification of the Sciences: The Nineteenth Century Tradition  . In Classifications in their Social Context, ed. R. F.Ellen and D. A.Reason, 167–93. London : Academic Press.

Dolby, R. G. A.. 1982. “On the Autonomy of Pure Science: The Construction and Maintenance of Barriers between Scientific Establishments and Popular Culture. Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook  6:267–92.

Duhem, P.. 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton , N.J. : Princeton Univ. Press.

Ellegard, A.1957. “The Darwinian Revolution and Nineteenthentury Philosophy of Science. Journal of the History of Ideas  18:362–93.

Engels, F.. 1946. The Dialectics of Nature. London : Lawrence and Wishart.

Feibleman, F. K.1959. “Darwin and Scientific Method. Tulane Studies in Philosophy  8:5–14.

Feyerabend, P. K.. 1970. “Consolations for the Specialist  . In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. I.Lakatos and A.Musgrave, 197–230. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Feyerabend, P. K.. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London : New Left Books.

Feyerabend, P. K.. 1978. Science in a Free Society. Manchester : New Left Books.

Gish, D. T.. 1979. Evolution? The Fossils say NO! San Diego , Calif. : Creation–Life Publishers.

Godfrey, L. R., ed. 1983. Scientists Confront Creationism. New York : Norton.

Kitcher, Philip. 1982. Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism. Cambridge , Mass. : MIT Press.

Kuhn, T. S.. 1970. TheStructure of Scientific Revolutions. ZAeA. Chicago: Univ. of ChicagoPress.

Kuhn, T. S.. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

LaFollette, M. C., ed. 1983. Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case. Cambridge , Mass. : MIT Press.

Lakatos, I.. 1970. “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes  . In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. I.Lakatos andA.Musgrave, 91–195. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Lakatos, I.. 1981. “Science and Pseudo–Science  . In Conceptions of Inquiry: A Reader, ed. S.Brown, J.Fauvel, andR.Finnegan, 114–21. London : Methuen.

Merton, R. K.. 1968. “Science and the Democratic Social Structure  ,” in his Social Structure and Social Theory. 3d ed., 604–15. New York : Free Press.

Merton, R. K.. 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science  ,” chap. 13 of his The Sociology of Science, 267–78. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Mill, J. S.. 1875. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 2 vols. 9th ed. London : Longman.

Morris, H. M., ed. 1974. Scientific Creationism. General ed. San Diego , Calif. : Creationism–Life Publishers.

Nagel, E.. 1961. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. New York : Harcourt, Brace & World.

Overton, Judge William R.. (1982). “McLean v. Arkansas. Opinion  . In Creationism, Science and the Law: The Arkansas Case, ed. M. C.LaFollette, 45–73. Cambridge , Mass. : MIT Press.

Poincare, H.. 1914. Science and Method. London : Nelson.

Poincare, H.. 1952. Science and Hypothesis. New York : Dover.

Poincare, H.. 1958. The Value of Science. New York : Dover.

Polanyi, M.. 1958. Personal Knowledge. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R.. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London : Hutchinson.

Popper, K. R.. 1974. Conjectures and Refutations. 5th ed. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R.. 1979. Objective Knowledge. Rev. ed. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Ravetz, J. R.. 1971. Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Rose, Hilary and StephenRose. 1976. “The Politics of Neurobiology: Biologism in the Service of the State  .” In The Political Economy of Science, ed. H. andS.Rose, 96–111. London : Macmillan.

Ruse, Michael. 1982. Darwinism Defended: A Guide to the Evolution Controversies. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.

Science. 1982. “Judge's Ruling Hits Hard at Creationism. Science  215:381–84.

Westfall, R. S.. 1973. Science and Religion in Seventeenth–Century England. Ann Arbor : Univ. of Michigan Press.

Whewell, W.. 1840. Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. 2 vols. London : Parker.

Whitcomb, J. and H.Morris. 1978. The Genesis Flood. Grand Rapids , Mich. : Baker.

Wilson, E. O.. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge , Mass. : Harvard Univ. Press.

Ziman, J.. 1968. Public Knowledge: An Essay Concerning the Social Dimension of Science. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Zuckerman, H.. 1977. “Deviant Behavior and Social Control in Science  .” In Deviance and Social Change, ed. E.Sagarin, 87–137. Beverly Hills , Calif. : Sage.