Banner, Michael C.1986. & “The Justification of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief.&” Ph.D. diss., Oxford University.

Barbour, Ian G. 1971. Issues in Science and Rlezpvu. New York : Harper & Row.

Barker, Eileen. 1981. “Science as Theology. The Theological Functioning of Western Science  .” In The Sciences and Theology in the Twentieth Century. Notre Dame : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Botha, Elaine. 1986.” Metaphorical Models and Scientific Realism. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association  1:374&–83.

Boyd, Richard. 1980Metaphor and Theory Change: What is  Metaphor” a Metaphor for? In Metaphor and Thought, ed. AndrewOrtony, 357–90. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Burham, F. B.1985. “Response to Arthur Peacocke. Religzon and Intellectual Life  2:27&ndash31.

Donnellan, Keith S.1972. “Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions  . “In Semantics of Natural Language, ed.DonaldDavidson and GilbertHarman356–78. Dordrecht : D. Reidl.

Echeverria, Edward J.1986. “Rationality and the Theory of Rationality. Christian Scholars Review  XV, 4372&–87.

Ferré, Fretlerick. 1980. “Science, Religion and Experience. In Experience, Reason and God  ,” ed. Eugene T. Long, 96–120. Washington : Catholic Univ. of America Press.

Gill, Jerry H. 1981. OnKnowing God. Philadelphia : Westminster Press.

Hefner, Philip. 1985. “Just How Much Can We Intimate about Reality? A Response to Arthur Peacocke. Religion and Intellectual Life  2:32&–37.

Kripke, Sad A.1972.” Naming and Necessity  .” In Semanticnl of Natural Language, ed. DonaldDavidson and GilhertHarman, 253&–355. Dordrecht: D. Reidl.

Lakoff, George and MarkJohnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

McMullin, Ernan. 1984. “A Case for Scientific Realism  .” In Scientfic Realism, ed. JarrettLeplin, 8–40. Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.

McMullin, Ernan. 1985. “Realism in Theology and Science: A Response to PeacockeReligzon and Intellectual Life  2:39–47.

McMullin, Ernan. 1986Explanatory Siiccess and the Truth of Theory  .” In Sczentfzc Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective Perspective, ed. NicholasRescher, 50–72. New York : Lanham.

McMullin, Ernan. 1987. “The Shaping of Scientific Rationality: Construction and Constraint  . Forthcoming  .

Newton‐Smith, W. H. 1981. The Rationality of Science. Boston : Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Hear, Anthony. 1984. “Experience, Explanation and Faith  . An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religaon. Boston : Routledge Kegan Paul.

Peacocke, Arthur. 1984. Intimations of Reality. Critical Realirm in Science and Religzon. Notre Dame : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Proudfoot, Wayne. 1985. Religious Experience. Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.

Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers  2:190–205.

Rottschaefer, William A.1985. “Religious Cognition as Interpreted Experience: An Examination of Ian Barbours Comparison of the Epistemic Structures of Science and Religion. Zygon: Journal of Religzon and Science  20:265–82.

Runzo, J. and C. K.Ihara, ed. 1986. Religious Experience and Religzous Belief. Essays in the Epistemology of Religzon. New York : Univ. Press of America.

Schoen, Edward L. 1985. Religzous Explanations. A Model from the Sciences. Durham , N.C. : Duke Univ. Press.

Soskice, Janet M. 1985. Metaphor and Religzour Language. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Schoen, Edward L. 1987. “Theological Realism  .” In The Rationality of Religious Belief. Essays in Honour of Basil Mitchell, ed. W. J.Ahraham and S. W.Holzer. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Trigg, R. 1973. Reason and Commitment. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

vanHuyssteen, Wentzel. 1986. Teologze asKritiese Geloofsverantwoording. Pretoria: RGN. Also in press 1988 as Theology and the Justification of Faith. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

vanHuyssteen, Wentzel. 1987. The Realism of the Text. Pretoria : UNISA.