Archibald, G. C..1979. “Method and Appraisal in Economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences  9:304–15.

Barbour, Ian. 1974. Myths, Models, and Paradigms. New York : Harper & Row.

Blaug, Mark. 1986. “Kuhn vs. Lakatos, or Paradigms versus Research Programmes inthe History of Economics  .” In Economic History and the History of Economics. New York : New York Univ. Press.

Clayton, Philip. 1988a. “Anticipation and Theological Method  .” In The Theology of Wolfhart Pannenberg: Twelve American Critiques, ed. CarlBraaten and PhilipClayton, 122–50. Minneapolis : Augsburg.

Clayton, Philip. 1988b. “Being and One Theologian. The Thomist  52:645–71.

Clayton, Philip. 1989. Explanation from Physics to Theology: An Essay in Rationality and Religion. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press.

Cross, Rod.1982. “The Duhem‐Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics. Economic Journal  92:320–40.

Eagleton, Terry. 1983. Literary Theory. Minneapolis : Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. London : NLB.

Fransman, Martin.198485. “Conceptualising Technical Change in the Third World in the 1980s: An Interpretive Survey. Journal of Development Studies  21:572–652.

Frei, Hans. 1974. The Eclipse of Biblzcal Narrative. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press.

Giddens, Anthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London : Hutchinson.

Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problem in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.

Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. ThomasMcCarthy. Boston : Beacon.

Hands, Douglas W..1979. “The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophy of the Social Sciences  9:293–303.

Hawkes, Terrence. 1977. From Structuralism to Semiotics. Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.

Hefner, Philip. 1988. “The Role of Science in Pannenberg's Theological Thinking  .” In The Theology of Wolfhart Pannenberg: Twelve American Critiques, ed. CarlBraaten and PhilipClayton. Minneapolis : Augsburg.

Heidegger, Martin. 1977. Heidegger: Basic Writings, ed. David F.Krell. New York : Harper & Row.

Holmes, Arthur. 1969. Christian Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Nutley , New Jersey : Craig.

Holmes, Arthur. 1971. Faith Seeks Understanding. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

Holton, Gerold. 1978. The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Holmes, Arthur. and W. A.Blanpied. 1976. Science and Its Public: The Changing Relationship. Boston Studies. vol. 33. Dordrecht : D. Reidel.

Hübner, Kurt. 1985. Wuhrheit des Mythos. Munich : C. H. Beck.

Jones, Kenneth. 1977. “Some Epistemological Considerations of Paradigm Shifts: Basic Steps Towards a Formulated Model of Alternation. Sociological Review  25:253–71.

Kayser, Wolfgang. 1959. Die Wahrheit der Dichter. Hamburg : Rowohlt.

Kekes, John. 1979. “Rationality and the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences  9:105–13.

Lakatos, Imre. 1978. Philosophical Papers, vol. 1: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, ed. JohnWorrall and GregoryCurrie. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Latsis, Spiro, ed. 1976. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Livingston, Paisley. 1988. Literary Knowledge: Humanistic Inquiry and the Philosophy of Science. Ithaca : Cornell Univ. Press.

Murphy, Nancey. 1987. “Acceptability Criteria for Work in Theology and Science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  22:279–97.

Murphy, Nancey. 1988. “A Lakatosian Reconstruction of Pannenberg's Program  .” Paper presented at the Pannenberg Symposium 11, Chicago Center for Religion and Science, November 15.

Murphy, Nancey. Forthcoming. Theology in the Age of Probable Reasoning: Historicist Philosophy of Science and Theological Method. Ithaca : Cornell Univ. Press.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart.1968. Jesus‐God and Man  , trans. Lewis Wilkens and Duane Priebe. Philadelphia : Westminster.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart1976. Theology and the Philosophy of Science, trans. FrancisMcDonagh. Philadelphia : Westminster.

Portis, E. B..1986. “Theoretical Authority in Social Science. The Social Science Journal  23:397–410.

Remenyi, Joseph V.. 1979. “Core Demi‐core Interaction: Toward a General Theory of Disciplinary and Subdisciplinary Growth. History of Political Economy  11:30–63.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1977. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi‐disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. R.Czerny. Toronto : Univ. of Toronto Press.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, ed. and trans. JohnThompson. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Sarkar, Husain. 1980. “Imre Lakatos' Meta‐Methodology: An Appraisal. Philosophy of the Social Sciences  10:397–416.

Sedlmayr, Hans. 1978. Kunst und Wahrheit. Itzelsberg : Mäander.

Steinvorth, Ulrich.1980. “Lakatos und politische Theorie. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie  11:35–46.

Steinvorth, Ulrich.1980. “Busshoffs Wissenschaftstheorie der Politikwissenschaft und Lakatos. Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenchaftstheorie  13:370–82.

Taylor, Mark. 1984. Erring: A Postmodern Altheology. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Taylor, Mark. 1986. Deconstruction in Context: Literature and Philosophy. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Taylor, Mark. 1987. Altarity. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Thiemann, Ronald. 1985. Revelation and Theology: The Gospel of Narrated Promise. Notre Dame : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Tompkins, Jane, ed. 1980. Reader‐Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post‐Structuralism. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.

Tracy, David. 1981. The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism. London : SCM.