Ayer, A. J.1954. “Freedom and Necessity  ” In Philosophical Essays, 271–84. London : Macmillan & Co.

Ayala, FranciscoJose, and TheodosiusDobzkansky, eds. Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems. New York : Macmillan.

Bellah, Robert.1970. Beyond Belief (Essays on Religion in a Post‐traditional World. New York : Harper & Row.

Berger, Peter.1974. “Some Second Thoughts on Substantive versus Functional Definitions of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion  13 (June): 125–33.

Bleeker, C. Jouco.1973. Hathor and Thoth: Two Key Figures of the Ancient Egyptian Religion. Leiden : E. J. Brill.

Carrasco, David.1990. Religions of Mesoamerica: Cosmovision and Ceremonial Centers. San Francisco : Harper & Row.

Foot, Philippa.1957. “Free Will as Involving Determinism. Philosophical Review  46 (October): 439–50.

Frazer, James George. [1922] 1950. The Golden Bough. Abridged ed. New York : Macmillan.

Fuller, Robert C.1987. “Religion and Empiricism in the Works of Peter Berger. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  22 (December): 497–510.

Gorski, Philip S.1990. “Scientism, Interpretation, and Criticism. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  25 (September): 279–307.

Kepnes, Steven D.1986. “Bridging the Gap between Understanding and Explanation Approaches to the Study of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion  25 (December): 504–12.

Klostermaier, Klaus K.1989. A Survey of Hinduism. Albany : State Univ. of New York Press.

MurphyNancey1990. “Theology and the Social Sciences–Discipline and Antidiscipline. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  25 (September): 309–16.

Pals, Daniel L.1987. “Is Religion a Sui Generic PhenomenonJournal of the American Academy of Religion  55 (Summer): 259–82.

Pals, Daniel L.1989. “Review of Religion and the Social Sciences, by Robert Segal. In Method and Theory in the Study of Religion  1 (Fall): 221–31.

Pals, Daniel L.1990a. “Autonomy, Legitimacy, and the Study of Religion. Religion  . 20:1–6.

Pals, Daniel L.1990b. “Autonomy Revisited: A Rejoinder to Its Critics Reductionism: A Review of the Epistemological Issues and Their Relevance to Biology and the Problem of Consciousness. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  11 (December): 307–34.

Segal, “In Defense of Reductionism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion  51 (March): 97–124. (Reprinted in Religion and the Social Sciences by Robert A. Segal, 5–36. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1989.)

Segal, 1986The ‘De‐Sociologizing’ of the Sociology of Religion. Scottish Journal of Religious Studies  7 (Spring): 5–28. (Reprinted in Religion and the Social Sciences by Robert A. Segal, 109–35. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1989.)

Segal, 1989. Religion and the Social Sciences: Essays on the Confrontation. Atlanta , Ga. : Scholars Press.

Segal. 1990. “Misconceptions of the Social Sciences. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  25 (September): 263–78.

Sharma, Arvind.1991. “Humanistic versus Social Scientific Approaches to Religion. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  26 (December): 541–46.

Vaux, Kenneth.1990. “Theology as Queen (Bee) of the DisciplinesZygon: Journal of Religion and Science  25 (September): 317–22.

Wiebe, Donald.1988. “Postulations for Safeguarding Preconceptions: The Case of the Scientific Religionist. Religion  18: ll–19.

Wilson, Bryan.1982. “The Academic Position of the Sociology of Religion in Modern Science. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies  9 (March): 9–18.

Wilson, Edward O.1990. “Biology and the Social Sciences. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  25 (September): 245–62 (First published in Daedalus 106 [Fall 1977]: 127–40