Abstract. All three articles properly locate my work as interactive between the sciences on the one hand and theology and ethics on the other. They disagree on whether tradition, science, or experience “trumps” the others when they conflict; Beckley shows the importance of tradition, which is slighted by the other two. Comments on each article indicate where further discussion is needed and where I have learned from the authors or agree with them.
sciences, experience, ethics, tradition, theology
Gustafson, J., (1995) “RESPONSE TO ROTTSCHAEFER, BECKLEY, AND KONNER”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 30(2), 221–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1995.tb00066.x
Views
Downloads
Dewey, John. 1934. A Common Faith. New Haven : Yale Univ. Press.
Gustafson, Janes M.1993. “Scientific Dreamers and Religious Speculation. The Christian Century 110 (March 10): 269–74.
Selznick, Philip. 1992. The Moral Commonwealth. Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.
| Pages | 221–226 |
|---|---|
| Published on | 1995-06-02 |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0