Abstract
Using a conceptual model consisting of three intersecting spheres of concern (environmental protection, human needs provision, and economic welfare) central to most environmental issues, we map six major Christian traditions of thought. Our purpose is to highlight the complementarities among these diverse responses in order to inform a more holistic Christian environmentalism founded on one or more of the major tenets of each of the six core traditions. Our approach also incorporates major premises of at least the more moderate versions of biocentrism, ecocentrism, and anthropocentrism. We label this holistic approach “cosmocentrism” and use it as the basis for a preliminary description of the notion of “pluralistic stewardship.” We argue that only such holistic environmental perspectives, where societal needs are more directly coupled with environmental protection, and a pluralism of worldviews are acknowledged as potentially contributing to such efforts are capable of successfully addressing the complex issues we face today. We note that, at the international level in particular, Christian thought and secular environmentalism already have been moving in such a direction.
Keywords
anthropocentrism, cosmocentrism, pluralism, global, holism, stewardship, environmentalism, biocentrism, ecocentrism, Christianity, environmental ethics
How to Cite
Grizzle, R. & Barrett, C., (1998) “The One Body of Christian Environmentalism”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 33(2), 233–253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00143
Rights
© 2024 The Author(s).46
Views
75
Downloads
4
Citations