Abstract

This paper reports the results of a ten‐year search for consensus among scientific findings on the nature of the origin and development of moral sensitivity and morality. Significant agreement on six underlying factors was found. Based on these foundations, a new theory of moral transformation and a scientific “global ethic” relating to the global ethic of Hans Kung and the Parliament of the World's Religions is proposed. Fields surveyed include psychology, sociology, political science, economics, history, and gender and feminist studies in social science; physics and biology in natural science; and brain research, archaeology, and both old and new evolutionary studies and theory, including chaos, self‐organizing, and other nonlinear theories, in systems science.

Keywords

dominator morality, gender relations, biological evolution, brain research, evolutionary theory, global ethic, cosmicevolution, science, social action, love, morality, freedom and equality, partnership morality, systems science, values, “two worlds”, religion, moral sensitivity, cultural evolution

How to Cite

Rights