Abstract
The March 1999 issue of Zygon provides a case illustration of a religion‐and‐science conversation. The three responses to the issues raised by The Humanizing Brain represent a spectrum ranging from skepticism to affirmation. Each is examined in turn. Next, we present a constructive set of guidelines beginning with the recognition that interdisciplinary talk requires stretching disciplinary language into metaphor and analogy. We conclude with a methodology emphasizing empiricism and wholism.
Keywords
evolution, neurotheology, the neurosciences, wholism, empirical theology, complexity, mind‐brain
How to Cite
Ashbrook, J. & Albright, C., (1999) “Religion and Science Conversation: A Case Illustration”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 34(3), 399–418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00223
Rights
© 2024 The Author(s).47
Views
89
Downloads