Skip to main content
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
    • Articles
    • Issues
  • About arrow_drop_down
    • About
    • Editorial Team
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Contact
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Start Submission
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
    • Journal Policies
    • Publisher Policies
  • Login
  • Register
  • Articles arrow_drop_down
    • Articles
    • Issues
  • About arrow_drop_down
    • About
    • Editorial Team
    • Become a Reviewer
    • Contact
  • Submissions arrow_drop_down
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Start Submission
  • Editorial Policies arrow_drop_down
    • Journal Policies
    • Publisher Policies
  • Login
  • Register
menu
Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections
Research Articles
Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections
Research Articles
Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections

Abstract

I develop a multilevel, holistic view of persons, emphasizing embodiment, emotions, consciousness, and the social self. In successive sections I draw from six sources: 1. Theology. The biblical understanding of the unitary, embodied, social self gave way in classical Christianity to a body‐soul dualism, but it has been recovered by many recent theologians. 2. Neuroscience. Research has shown the localization of mental functions in regions of the brain, the interaction of cognition and emotion, and the importance of social interaction in evolutionary history and child development. 3. Artificial intelligence. Some forms of robotics use embodied systems that learn by interacting with their environment, but the possibilities for emotion, socialization, and consciousness in robots remain problematic. 4. Relations between levels. Concepts that can help us relate studies of neurons and persons include the hierarchy of levels, the communication of information, thebehavior of dynamic systems, and epistemological and ontological emergence. 5. Philosophy of mind. Two‐aspect theories of the mind‐brain relation offer an alternative between the extremes of eliminative materialism and the thesis that consciousness is irreducible. 6. Process philosophy. I suggest that process thought provides a coherent philosophical framework in which these themes can be brought together. It combines dipolar monism with organizational pluralism, and it emphasizes embodiment, emotions, a hierarchy oflevels, and the social character of selfhood.

How to Cite

Barbour, I., (1999) “Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Nature: Theological and Philosophical Reflections”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 34(3), 361–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00222

Rights

© 2024 The Author(s).

Downloads

Download XML
Download PDF

177

Views

159

Downloads

8

Citations

Share

𝕏

Authors

Ian G. Barbour (Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science)

Downloads

  • Download XML
  • Download PDF

Issue

  • Volume 34 • Issue 3 • September 1999

Publication details

Pages 361–398
Published on 1999-09-01

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00222

File Checksums (MD5)

  • XML: 8b1941d3614df8d52d5302302ac6a412
  • PDF: 3fa7314806092bd8f2ae56604e18f3c0

Table of Contents

Non Specialist Summary

This article has no summary

Close

| ISSN: 1467-9744 | Published by Open Library of Humanities | Privacy Policy |