Abstract
Many religious critics argue that biotechnology (such as cloning and genetic engineering) intrudes on God's domain, or plays God, or revolts against God. While some of these criticisms are standard complaints about human hubris, I argue that some of the recent criticism represents a “Promethean” concern, in which believers unreflectively seem to fear that science and technology are actually replicating or stealing God's special deity–defining powers. These criticisms backfire theologically, because they diminish God, portraying God as an anthropomorphic superbeing whose relevance and special nature are increasingly rivaled by human power.
Keywords
biotechnology, genetic engineering, God of the Gaps, religious criticism, Babel, God, religion and technology, hubris, Prometheus, theology, religion and science, cloning
How to Cite
Hopkins, P., (2002) “Protecting God from Science and Technology: How Religious Criticisms of Biotechnologies Backfire”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37(2), 317–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00431
Rights
© 2024 The Author(s).55
Views
65
Downloads
6
Citations