Abstract
I respond herein to reviews of my recent book by Ann Pederson and Stuart Kurtz. With respect to Pederson's concerns, a constructive theology formulated from the ideas of communication theory need not necessarily neglect pressing historical issues of the poor and powerless. The potential for such relevance remains strong. This is true as well for the application of the system to particular myths and rituals. Also, while I speak positively of computers as instruments of disclosure and the theories upon with they are based as resources for theological construction, this should not be construed as an endorsement of just any application of information technology in a world that tends to distort all good things. With respect to Kurtz's concerns, while thermodynamics plays a role in discussions of the primordial chaos, notions from communication theory are far more central. Also, the use of the language of the theory for theology does not necessarily require theological relevance for all of Claude Shannon's technical conclusions. My uses of infinity are taken from traditional theology and analytic geometry rather than from pure mathematics, although fruitful development along those lines is entirely possible. Pederson and Kurtz are generous with both their praise and concerns. The praise will encourage me to further this project along lines provided by the concerns.
Keywords
thermodynamics, chaos, metaphysics, infinity, Claude Shannon, Maxwell's demon, cosmology, Liberation theology, creatio ex nihilo, communication theory
How to Cite
Huchingson, J., (2002) “Response to Stuart Kurtz and Ann Pederson”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37(2), 433–442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00438
Rights
© 2024 The Author(s).49
Views
60
Downloads