Abstract
Science and religion are incommensurable: one cannot use centimeters to measure volume. Science's proper cognate is theology. Science and theology are human activities that are basically conceptual (partly fallible) frameworks for explaining experience. Religion and technology, by contrast, involve and control or limit human practice and experience: they involve “sensate” reality—people and things. The study of the interaction of these four terms (or any two) must use the terms more precisely. Science as practiced today has become scientism, another theology. Technology is, without any doubt, the world's most powerful and fastest growing religion. Minor squabbles among theologies, including science, must continue, but it is the tensions between technology and the established religions that will define this century. Battles on three fronts are already clear: the environment, globalization, and economic gaps. But whole–person healing, the replacement for high–tech reductionist modern medicine, is the most significant, because it will undermine science, which has hitched its wagon to this falling star. The end of fundamental science is upon us, because it has been so successful. Science will be increasingly applications–driven, and it will be judged by results. Here, it has met its nemesis in wholeperson healing that incorporates integrative medicine. Scientists must now reconsider their role in society. It will not be easy to accept a humbler position. Moreover, the vague allusions to spirituality by scientists need a more authentic commitment to praxis in lifestyle.
Keywords
spiritual fuzziness, technology–religion relation, reality test, science–theology relation, medicine
How to Cite
Roy, R., (2002) “Religion/Technology, Not Theology/Science, as the Defining Dichotomy”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 37(3), 667–676. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9744.00444
Rights
© 2024 The Author(s).60
Views
73
Downloads
5
Citations