Barbour, Ian.1997. Religion and Science: Historical and Contemporary Issues. San Francisco : HarperCollins.

Benton, Thomas H.2005. “Life after the Death of Theory. The Chronicle of Higher Education51  (34, April 29): C1.

Brooke, John Hedley.1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Caiazza, John C.2005. “Athens, Jerusalem, and the Arrival of Techno‐Secularism. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (March): 9–21.

Clayton, Philip.2005. “The Religion‐Science Discussion at Forty Years: ‘Reports of My Death are Premature. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (March): 23–32.

Davies, Paul.1984. God and the New Physics. New York : Simon and Schuster.

Drees, Willem B.1999. Religion, Science, and Naturalism. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Drees, Willem B.2005. “‘Religion and Science’ as Advocacy of Science and as Religion versus Religion. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (September): 545–53.

Gould, Stephen Jay.1999. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York : Ballantine.

Hauerwas, StanleyPaul J.Griffiths, and Jean Bethke, Elshtain.2003. “War, Peace, and Jean Bethke Elshtain. First Things  136: 41–47.

Haught, John F.2005. “Science and Scientism: The Importance of a Distinction. Zygon: Journal ofReligion and Science  40 (June): 363–68.

Hefner, Philip.1993. The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture and Religion. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Hefner, Philip.2003. Technology and Human Becoming. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Jackelén, Antje.2005. “What is ‘Secular’? Techno‐secularism and Spirituality. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (December): 863–73.

Kaufman, Gordon.2004. In the beginning… Creativity. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Kaufman, Gordon.2005. “Techno‐Secularism and ‘Revealed Religion’: Some Problems with Caiazza's Analysis. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (June): 323–33.

King, Ursula.2005. “The Journey beyond Athens and Jerusalem. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (September): 535–44.

Lawson, E. Thomas.2005. “A New Look at the Science‐and‐Religion Dialogue. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (September): 555–63.

Lindberg, David C. and Ronald L.Numbers, eds. 1986. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Religion and Science. Berkeley : Univ. of California Press.

Murphy, Nancey.1990. Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning. Ithaca , N.Y. : Cornell Univ. Press.

Murphy, Nancey, and George, F. R. Ellis.1996. On the Moral Nature of the Universe: Theology, Cosmology, and Ethics. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Oviedo, Lluís.2005. “Whom to Blame for the Charge of SecularizationZygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (June): 351–61.

Padgett, Alan G.2005. “God versus Technology? Science, Secularity, and the Theology of Technology. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (September): 577–84.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart.2005. “Notes on the Alleged Conflict between Religion and Science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (September): 585–88.

Peacocke, Arthur.1984. Intimations of Reality: Critical Realism in Science and Religion. Notre Dame , Ind. : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Peacocke, Arthur.1986. God and the New Biology. London : J. M. Dent.

Peters, Ted.1997. Playing God: Genetic Determinism and Human Freedom. New York : Rout‐ledge.

Peters, Ted.2005. “Techno‐Secularism, Religion, and the Created Co‐Creator. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (December): 845–62.

Polkinghorne, John.1986. One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology. Princeton , N.J. : Princeton Univ. Press.

Polkinghorne, John.2005. “The Continuing Interaction of Science and Religion. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (March): 43–50.

Puddefoot, John.1994. “Response by John Puddefoot  .”In Science and Theology: Questions at the Interface, ed. MurrayRae, HilaryRegan, and JohnStenhouse, 137–47. Grand Rapids , Mich. : William B. Eerdmans.

Raman, VaradarajaV.2005. “Techno‐Secularism: Comments and Reflections. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (December): 823–34.

Roy, Rustum.2005. “Scientism and Technology as Religions. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (December): 835–44.

Russell, Bertrand. [1935] 1997. Religion and Science. New York : Oxford Univ. Press.

Sagan, Carl.1997. The Demon‐Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. New York : Ballantine.

Samuelson, Norbert.1994. Judaism and the Doctrine of Creation. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Samuelson, Norbert.2005. “Culture and History: Essential Partners in the Conversation between Religion and Science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (June): 335–50.

Stone, Jerome.2004. “Philip Hefner and the Modernist/Postmodernist Divide. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  39 (December): 755–72.

Strassberg, Barbara A.2005. “Magic, Religion, Science, Technology, and Ethics in the Postmodern World. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (June): 307–22.

Szerszynski, Bronislaw.2005. “Rethinking the Secular: Science, Technology and Religion Today. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (December): 813–22.

Tirosh‐Samuelson, Hava.2005. “Rethinking the Past and Anticipating the Future of Religion and Science. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  40 (March): 33–41.

Tracy, David.1989. Plurality and Ambiguity: Hermeneutics, Religion, Hope. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Vanhoozer, Kevin J.2003. The Cambridge Companion to Postmodern Theology. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

VanHuyssteen, J. Wentzel, 1999. The Shaping of Rationality: Toward Interdisciplinarity in Theology and Science. Grand Rapids , Mich. : William B. Eerdmans.

Wallace, Alan, ed. 2003. Buddhism and Science: Breaking New Ground. New York : Columbia Univ. Press.

Ward, Graham.2004. The Blackwell Companion to Postmodern Theology. New York : Black‐well.

Wildman, Wesley.2004. “The Divine Action Project: 1988–2003. Theology and Science  2: 31–75.