In this reply to Gregory Peterson's essay “Maintaining Respectability,” which itself is a response to my “Is Theology Respectable as Metaphysics?” I elaborate upon my claims that theology treats God's existence as an absolute certainty immune to refutation and that modern science constitutes the canons of respectable reasoning for metaphysical disciplines. I conclude with some comments on Peterson's “In Praise of Folly? Theology and the University.”
metaphysics, falsification, theology, scientific method, evidentialism
Jones, N., (2008) “EVIDENCE AND FALSIFICATION: CHALLENGES TO GREGORY PETERSON”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 43(3), 599–604. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00942.x
Views
Downloads
Jones, Nicholaos. 2008. “Is Theology Respectable as MetaphysicsZygon: Journal of Religion and Science 43:579–92.
Peterson, Gregory R.2008a. “In Praise of Folly? Theology and the University. Zygon: journal of Religion and Science 43:563–77.
Peterson, Gregory R.2008b. “Maintaining Respectability: Response to Nicholaos Jones. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 43:593–98.
| Pages | 599–604 |
|---|---|
| Published on | 2008-09-02 |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0