Adams, Marilyn McCord. 1993. “The Role of Miracles in the Structure of Luke‐Acts.  ” In Hermes and Athena: Biblical Exegesis and Philosophical Theology, ed. EleanoreStump and Thomas P.Flint, 235–74. Notre Dame Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 7. Notre Dame , Ind. : Univ. of Notre Dame Press.

Armstrong, David1983. What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bartholomew, David J.1984. God of Chance. London : SCM.

Basinger, David, and RandallBasinger1986. Philosophy and Miracle: The Contemporary Debate. Problems in Contemporary Philosophy 2. Lewiston and Queenston : Edwin Mellen.

Beebee, Helen2004. “The Non‐governing Conception of Laws of Nature.  ” In Readings on Laws of Nature, ed. John W.Carroll, 250–76. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Brown, Colin1984. Miracles and the Critical Mind. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, and Exeter, U.K.: Paternoster.

Brown, William Adams. 1927. Life of Prayer in a World of Science. New York : Charles Scribner's.

Buller, David J.1999. “Introduction: Natural Teleology  .” In Function, Selection, and Design, ed. David J.Buller, 1–27. Albany : State Univ. of New York Press.

Carroll, John1994. Laws of Nature. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Carroll, John2004. “Introduction.  ” In Readings on Laws of Nature, ed. John W.Carroll, 1–15. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Cartwright, Nancy1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford : Clarendon, and New York : Oxford Univ. Press.

Cartwright, Nancy1989. Natures Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford : Clarendon.

Chalmers, Alan1993. “So the Laws of Physics Needn't Lie.Australasian Journal of Philosophy  71 (2): 196–205.

Chalmers, Alan1999. “Making Sense of Laws of Physics.  ” In Causation and the Laws of Nature, ed. HowardSankey, 3–16. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic.

Cohen, Richard A.1996. “The Miracle of Miracles: More Ancient than Knowledge.  ” In Divine Intervention and Miracles in Jewish Theology, ed. DanCohn‐Sherbok, 75–98. Jewish Studies 16. Lewiston, Queenston, and Lampeter: Edwin Mellen.

Colapietro, Vincent2004. “C. S. Peirces Reclamation of Teleology.  ” In Nature in American Philosophy, ed. JeanDe Greet, 88–108. Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 42. Washington, D.C.: Catholic Univ. of America Press.

Collins, C. John. 2000. The God of Miracles: An Exegetical Examination of God's Action in the World. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway.

Corner, David2007. The Philosophy of Miracles. London and New York : Continuum.

Corner, Mark2005. Signs of God: Miracles and Their Interpretation. Aldershot , U.K. , and Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.

Davies, Paul1995. “Algorithmic Compressibility, Fundamental and Phenomenological Laws.  ” In Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, ed. FriedelWeinert, 248–67. Philosophie und Wissenschaft Transdisziplinäre Studien 8. Berlin and New York : Walter de Gruyter.

Descartes, René. [1983] 1984. Principles of Philosophy. Trans. ValentineRodger Miller and Reese P.Miller. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: D. Reidel.

Dorato, Mauro2005. The Software of the Universe: An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature. Burlington, Vt., and Aldershot , U.K. : Ashgate.

Dretske, Fred I.2004. “Laws of Nature.  ” In Readings on Laws of Nature, ed. John W.Carroll, 16–37. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Earman, John2000. Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Earman, John, and JohnRoberts2004. “ Ceteris paribus, There Is No Problem of Provisos.  ” In Readings on Laws of Nature, ed. John W.Carroll, 207–49. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Ellis, Brian1999. “Causal Powers and Laws of Nature.  ” In Causation and the Laws of Nature, ed. HowardSankey, 19–35. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic.

Ellis, George F. R.1995. “Ordinary and Extraordinary Divine Action: The Nexus of Interaction.  ” In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and Arthur R.Peacocke, 360–95. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Ervin, Howard M.2002. Healing: A Sign of the Kingdom. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson.

Esposito, Joseph L.1980. Evolutionary Metaphysics: The Development of Peirces Theory of Categories. Athens : Ohio Univ. Press.

Farmer, H. H.1948. The World and God: A Study of Prayer, Providence and Miracle in Christian Experience.2d ed. London : Nisbet and Co.

Faye, Jan, PaulNeedham, UweScheffler, and MaxUrchs, eds. 2005. Natures Principles. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science 4. Dordrecht , The Netherlands : Springer.

Fogelin, Robert J.2003. A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton and Oxford : Princeton Univ. Press.

Forge, John1996. “Laws and States in Quantum Mechanics.  ” In Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology, ed. Peter J.Riggs, 163–85. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic.

Foster, John2004. The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature, and the Existence of God. Oxford : Clarendon.

Giere, Ronald N.1994. Science without Laws. Chicago and London : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Green, Richard1995. The Thwarting of Laplaces Demon: Arguments against the Mechanistic World‐View. New York : St. Martins.

Gregersen, Niels Henrik. 2006. “Divine Action, Compatibilism, and Coherence Theory: A Response to Russell, Clayton, and Murphy.Theology and Science  4 (3): 215–28.

Haarsma, Loren2003. “Does Science Exclude God? Natural Law, Chance, Miracles, and Scientific Practice.  ” In Perspectives on an Evolving Creation, ed. Keith B.Miller, 72–94. Grand Rapids, Mich., and Cambridge: Eerdmans.

Harper, Albert W. J.1993. Studies in the Interrelationship between Miracles and the Laws of Nature. San Francisco, Calif.: Edwin Mellen.

Harré, Rom. 1993. Laws of Nature. London : Duckworth.

Hartshorne, Charles, PaulWeiss, and Arthur W.Burks, eds. 19651966. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce.8 vols. Cambridge : Harvard Univ. Press, Belknap Press.

Hausman, Carl R.1993. Charles S. Peirces Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Heathcote, Adrian1996. “Of Crows and Quarks: Reflections on the Laws of Quantum Mechanics.  ” In Natural Kinds, Laws of Nature and Scientific Methodology, ed. Peter J.Riggs, 145–61. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 12. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic.

Hesse, Mary1965. “Miracles and the Laws of Nature.  ” In Miracles: Cambridge Studies in Their Philosophy and History, ed. C. F. D.Moule, 33–42. New York : Morehouse‐Barlow, and London : A. R. Mowbray.

Holton, Gerald James, and Stephen G.Brush2001. Physics, the Human Adventure: From Copernicus to Einstein and Beyond.3d ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers Univ. Press.

Houston, J.1994. Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume. Cambridge and New York : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Hulswit, Menno1996. “Teleology: A Peircean Critique of Ernst Mayrs Theory.Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society  32 (2): 182–214.

Hulswit, Menno1997. “Peirces Teleological Approach to Natural Classes.Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society  33 (3): 722–72.

Hume, David [1748] 1952. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. L. A.Selby‐Bigge. Chicago : Encyclopedia Britannica.

John, Jeffrey2004. The Meaning in the Miracles. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.

Johnson, David1999. Hume, Holism, and Miracles. Ithaca, N.Y., and London: Cornell Univ. Press.

Kee, Howard Clark. 1986. Medicine, Miracle and Magic in New Testament Times. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Knight, Christopher C.2007. The God of Nature: Incarnation and Contemporary Science. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Lange, Marc2000. Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Larmer, Robert A. H.1988. Water into Wine? An Investigation of the Concept of Miracle. Kingston and Montreal : McGill‐Queens Univ. Press.

Legg, Cathy1999. “Real Law in Peirce's ‘Pragmaticism’ (Or: How Scholastic Realism Met the Scientific Method).  ” In Causation and the Laws of Nature, ed. HowardSankey, 125–42. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic.

Lewis, C. S.1947. Miracles: A Preliminary Study. New York : Macmillan.

Lewis, David1996. “Humean Supervenience.Philosophical Topics  24:101–27.

Locke, John1997. “Essays on the Laws of Nature.  ” In Locke: Political Essays, ed. MarkGoldie, 79–133. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Loewer, Barry2004. “Humean Supervenience.  ” In Readings on Laws of Nature, ed. John W.Carroll, 176–206. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Marguerat, Daniel2003. “Magic and Miracle in the Acts of the Apostles.  ” In Magic in the Biblical World: From the Rod of Aaron to the Ring of Solomon, ed. Todd E.Klutz, 100–24. London and New York : T. & T. Clark.

Mayorga, Rosa Maria Perez‐Teran. 2007. From Realism to “Realicism”: The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham, Md.: Lexington.

McGee, Gary B., ed. 1991. Initial Evidence: Historical and Biblical Perspectives on the Pentecostal Doctrine of Spirit Baptism. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson.

Molnar, George2003. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Ed. StephenMumford. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Morris, Tim, and DonPetcher2006. Science and Grace: Gods Reign in the Natural Sciences. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway.

Mumford, Stephen1998. Dispositions. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Mumford, Stephen2004. Laws in Nature. London and New York : Routledge.

Murphy, Nancey1995. “Divine Action in the Natural Order: Buridans Ass and Schrödinger's Cat.  ” In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and Arthur R.Peacocke, 325–57. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Myllykoski, Matti2006. “Being There: The Function of the Supernatural in Acts 1–12.  ” In Wonders Never Cease: The Purpose of Narrating Miracle Stories in the New Testament and Its Religious Environment, ed. MichaelLabahn and BertJanLietaertPeerbolte, 146–79. European Studies on Christian Origins 288. London and New York : T. & T. Clark.

Nesteruk, Alexei2003. Light from the East: Theology, Science and the Eastern Orthodox Tradition. Minneapolis : Fortress.

Neusner, Jacob1989. “Science and Magic, Miracle and Magic in Formative Judaism: The System and the Difference.  ” In Religion, Science, and Magic: In Concert and in Conflict, ed. JacobNeusner, Ernest S.Frerichs, and PaulVirgilMcCrackenFlesher, 61–81. New York and Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Oakley, Francis1984. Omnipotence, Covenant, and Order: An Excursion in the History of Ideas from Abelard to Leibniz. Ithaca, N.Y., and London: Cornell Univ. Press.

Oakley, Francis2002. Omnipotence and Promise: The Legacy of the Scholastic Distinction of Powers. The Etienne Gilson Series 23. Toronto : Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

Oakley, Francis2005. Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas. New York and London : Continuum.

Ostrander, Rick2000. The Life of Prayer in a World of Science: Protestants, Prayer, and American Culture 1870–1930. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart1977. Jesus—God and Man. Trans. Lewis L.Wilkins and Duane A.Priebe. 2d ed. Philadelphia : Westminster.

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1997. Pragmatism as a Principle and Method of Right Thinking: The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. Ed. PatriciaAnn Turrisi. Albany : State Univ. of New York Press.

Penrose, Roger, et al.1997. The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Ed. MalcolmLongair. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Peters, Ted1999. “Resurrection of the Very Embodied Soul?  ” In Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphyTheo C.Meyering, and Michael A.Arbib, 305–26. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Pew Research Center2006. “Spirit and Power: A 10‐Country Survey of Pentecostals.” Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. http://pewforum.org/publications/surveys/pentecostals‐06.pdf.

Polkinghorne, John1999. “The Laws of Nature and the Laws of Physics.  ” In Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and C. J.Isham, 429–40. 2d ed. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Purtill, R. L.1997. “Defining Miracles.  ” In In Defense of Miracles: A Comprehensive Case for God's Action in History, ed. R.Douglas Geivett and Gary R.Habermas, 61–72. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity.

Reimer, Andy M.2002. Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 235. New York and London : Sheffield Academic Press.

Reynolds, Andrew2002. Peirces Scientific Metaphysics: The Philosophy of Chance, Law, and Evolution. Nashville : Vanderbilt Univ. Press.

Robinson, Andrew J.2004. “Continuity, Naturalism, and Contingency: A Theology of Evolution Drawing on the Semiotics of C. S. Peirce and Trinitarian Thought.Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  39:111–36.

Rosenthal, Sandra1982. “Meaning as Habit: Some Systematic Implications of Peirces Pragmatism.The Monist  65:230–45.

Russell, Robert John. 2002. “Eschatology and Physical Cosmology: A Preliminary Reflection.  ” In The Far‐Future Universe: Eschatology from a Cosmic Perspective, ed. George F. R.Ellis, 266–315. Philadelphia and London : Templeton Foundation Press.

Russell, Robert John. 2006aAn Appreciative Response to Niels Henrik Gregersens JKR Research Conference Lecture.Theology and Science  4 (2): 129–35.

Russell, Robert John. 2006b. “Quantum Physics and the Theology of Non‐Interventionist Objective Divine Action  .” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, ed. PhilipClayton and ZacharySimpson, 579–95. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Russell, Robert John, PhilipClayton, KirkWegter‐McNelly, and JohnPolkinghorne, eds. 2001. Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Russell, Robert John, NanceyMurphy, and Arthur R.Peacocke, eds. 1995. Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory and Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Ruthven, Jon1993. On the Cessation of the Charismata: The Protestant Polemic on Post‐biblical Miracles. Sheffield : Sheffield Academic Press.

Saunders, Nicholas2002. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Schaaff, Werner1974. Theology, Physics, and Miracles. Trans. Richard L.Renfield. Washington, D.C.: Canon.

Sfendoni‐Mentzou, Demetra1997. “Peirce on Continuity and the Laws of Nature.Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society  33 (3): 646–78.

Shapiro, Gary1973. “Habit and Meaning in Peirces Pragmatism.Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society  9:24–40.

Steinle, Friedrich1995. “The Amalgamation of a Concept—Laws of Nature in the New Sciences.  ” In Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, ed. FriedelWeinert, 316–68. Philosophie und Wissenschaft Transdisziplinäre Studien 8. Berlin and New York : Walter de Gruyter.

Stoeger, William R.1995. “Describing Gods Action in the World in Light of Scientific Knowledge of Reality.  ” In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and Arthur R.Peacocke, 239–61. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Stoeger, William R.1999. “Contemporary Physics and the Ontological Status of the Laws of Nature.  ” In Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. RobertJohn Russell, NanceyMurphy, and C. J.Isham, 207–31. 2d ed. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory, and Berkeley, Calif: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.

Swartz, Norman1985. The Concept of Physical Law. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Swartz, Norman1995. “A Neo‐Humean Perspective: Laws as Regularities.  ” In Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, ed. FriedelWeinert, 68–91. Philosophie und Wissenschaft Transdisziplinäre Studien 8. Berlin and New York : Walter de Gruyter.

Swinburne, Richard1970. The Concept of Miracle. London : Macmillan and St. Martins.

Thirring, Walter1995. “Do the Laws of Nature Evolve?  ” In What Is Life? The Next Fifty Years—Speculations on the Future of Biology, ed. Michael P.Murphy and Luke A. J.O'Neill, 131–36. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Thomas, Günter. 2002. “Resurrection to New Life: Pneumatological Implications of the Eschatological Transition.  ” In Resurrection: Theological and Scientific Assessments, ed. TedPeters, RobertJohn Russell, and MichaelWelker, 255–76. Grand Rapids, Mich., and Cambridge: Eerdmans.

Tooley, Michael2004. “The Nature of Laws.  ” In Readings on Laws of Nature, ed. John W.Carroll, 38–70. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.

Twelftree, Graham H.1999. Jesus the Miracle Worker: A Historical and Theological Study. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity.

Van Fraassen, Bas C.1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford : Clarendon.

Ward, Keith1988. “God as a Principle of Cosmological Explanation.  ” In Physics, Philosophy and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding, ed. RobertJohn Russell, WilliamR.Stoeger, S.J., and GeorgeV.Coyne, S.J., 247–61. Vatican City State : Vatican Observatory.

Ward, Keith1991. Divine Action. London : Collins.

Ward, Keith1998. God, Faith and the New Millennium: Christian Belief in an Age of Science. Oxford : Oneworld.

Wiener, Philip P.1965. Evolution and the Founders of Pragmatism. New York : Harper Torchbooks.

Wildman, Wesley J.2004. “The Divine Action Project, 1988–2003.Theology and Science  2 (1): 31–75.

Yong, Amos2000. “The Demise of Foundationalism and the Retention of Truth: What Evangelicals Can Learn from C. S. Peirce.Christian Scholars Review  29 (3): 563–88.

Yong, Amos2005aAcademic Glossolalia? Pentecostal Scholarship, Multi‐disciplinarity, and the Science‐Religion Conversation.Journal of Pentecostal Theology  14 (1): 63–82.

Yong, Amos2005bThe Spirit and Creation: Possibilities and Challenges for a Dialogue between Pentecostal Theology and the Sciences.Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association  25:82–110.

Yong, Amos2005cDiscerning the Spirit(s) in the Natural World: Toward a Typology of ‘Spirit’ in the Theology and Science Conversation.Theology & Science  3 (3): 315–29.

Yong, Amos2005d. The Spirit Poured Out on All Flesh: Pentecostalism and the Possibility of Global Theology. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic.

Yong, Amos2006. “ Ruach, the Primordial Waters, and the Breath of Life: Emergence Theory and the Creation Narratives in Pneumatological Perspective.  ” In The Work of the Spirit: Pneumatology and Pentecostalism, ed. MichaelWelker, 183–204. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.

Yong, Amos Forthcoming. “The Spirit at Work in the World: A Pentecostal‐Charismatic Perspective on the Divine Action Project. Theology and Science.  .