Aslin, Richard N., Jenny R.Saffran, and Elissa L.Newport. 1998. “Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8‐month‐old infants. Psychological Science  9:321–24.

Barrett, H. Clark. 2004. “Descent versus design in Shuar children's reasoning about animals. Journal of Cognition and Culture  4:25–50.

Barrett, Justin L.1998. “Cognitive constraints on Hindu concepts of the Divine. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion  37:608–19.

Barrett, Justin L., and Frank C.Keil. 1996. “Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology  31:219–47.

Basalla, George. 1988. The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bering, Jesse M.2006. “The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences  29:453–62.

Bloom, Paul. 1996. “Intention, history and artifact concept. Cognition  60:1–29.

Bloom, Paul. 2007. “Religion is natural. Developmental Science  10:147–51.

Bloom, Paul, and LoriMarkson. 1998. “Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science  9:200–204.

Butler, Joseph. 1736. The analogy of religion, natural and revealed, to the constitution and cause of nature  . http://posner.library.cmu.edu/Posner/books/book.cgi?call=219_B98A_1736.

Casler, Krista, and DeborahKelemen. 2007. “Reasoning about artifacts at 24 months: The developing teleo‐functional stance. Cognition  103:120–30.

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 45 B.C. The Nature of the Gods. Book II  . http://trisagionseraph.tripod.com/Texts/Cicero2.html.

Cosmides, Leda, and JohnTooby1995. “Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionary rigorous cognitive science  .” In Cognition on Cognition, ed. JacquesMehler and SusanaFranck, 69–105. Cambridge : MIT Press.

Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London : John Murray.

Dawkins, Richard. [1986] 1991. The Blind Watchmaker. London : Penguin.

De Cruz, Helen. 2009. “The role of intuitive probability in scientific theory formation  .” In Foundations of the Formal Sciences VI: Probabilistic Reasoning and Reasoning with Probabilities, ed. BenediktLöwe, EricPacuit, and Jan‐WillemRomeijn, 123–39. London : College.

De Cruz, Helen, and JohanDe Smedt. 2007. “The role of intuitive ontologies in scientific understanding—The case of human evolution. Biology and Philosophy  22:351–68.

Dembski, William A.1998. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.

Dennett, Daniel. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge : MIT Press.

Diaconis, Persi, and FrederickMosteller. 1989. “Methods for studying coincidences. Journal of the American Statistical Association  84:853–61.

Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1973. “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher (March)  : 125–29.

Douven, Igor. 2002. “Testing inference to the best explanation. Synthese  130:355–77.

Evans, E. Margaret. 2001. “Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology  42:217–66.

Fichman, Martin. 2001. “Science in theistic contexts: A case study of Alfred Russell Wallace on human evolution. Osiris  16:227–50.

Frank, Patrick. 2004. “On the assumption of design. Theology and Science  2:109–30.

Gelman, Susan A., and PaulBloom. 2000. “Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition  76:91–103.

Gelman, Susan A., and Karen S.Ebeling. 1998. “Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition  66:35–47.

Gentner, Derdre, SarahBrem, Ronald W.Ferguson, Arthur B.Markman, Björn B.Levidow, PhilipWolff, and Kenneth D.Forbus. 1997. “Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case‐study of Johannes Kepler. Journal of the Learning Sciences  6:3–40.

German, Tim P., and H. ClarkBarrett. 2005. “Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science  16:1–5.

Girotto, Vittorio, and MichelGonzales. 2008. “Children's understanding of posterior probability. Cognition  106:325–44.

Gliboff, Sander. 2000. “Paley's design argument as an inference to the best explanation, or, Dawkins' dilemma. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Science  31:579–97.

Gray, Asa. 1888. Darwiniana: Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism. New York : Appleton.

Griffiths, Thomas L., and Joshua B.Tenenbaum. 2007. “From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries. Cognition  103:180–226.

Gutheil, Grant, PaulBloom, NohemyValderrama, and RebeccaFreedman. 2004. “The role of historical intuitions in children's and adults' naming of artifacts. Cognition  91:23–42.

Himma, Kenneth. 2005. “The application‐conditions for design inferences: Why the design arguments need the help of other arguments for God's existence. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion  57:1–33.

Horner, Victoria, and AndrewWhiten. 2005. “Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition  8:164–81.

Hume, David. 1779. Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. 2d ed. London : Hafner.

Jaswal, Vikram K.2006. “Preschoolers favor the creator's label when reasoning about an artifacts function. Cognition  99:B83–B92.

Johnson, Jeffery L., and JoyclynnPotter. 2005. “The argument from language and the existence of God. The Journal of Religion  85:83–93.

Kant, Immanuel. [1790] 1987. Critique of Judgment. Trans. WernerPluhar. Indianapolis : Hackett.

Kelemen, Deborah. 2003. “British and American children's preferences for teleo‐functional explanations of the natural world. Cognition  88:201–21.

Kelemen, Deborah. 2004. “Are children ‘intuitive theists’? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science  15:295–301.

Kelemen, Deborah, and CaraDiYanni. 2005. “Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development  6:3–31.

Kelemen, Deborah, and EvelynRosset. 2009. “The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition  11:138–43.

Kuhn, Thomas S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Press.

Lombrozo, Tania, DeborahKelemen, and DeborahZaitchik. 2007. “Inferring design: Evidence of a preference for teleological explanations in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Psychological Science  18:999–1006.

Miller, Jon, EugenieScott, and ShinjiOkamoto. 2006. “Public acceptance of evolution. Science  313:765–66.

Miller, Kenneth R.[1999] 2007. Finding Darwin's God: A Scientists Search for Common Ground between God and Evolution. New York : Harper.

Millman, Arthur B., and Carol L.Smith. 1997. “Darwin's use of analogical reasoning in theory construction. Metaphor and Symbol  12:159–87.

Paley, William. [1802] 2006. Natural Theology or Evidence of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press.

Plantinga, Alvin. 1991. “The prospects for natural theology. Philosophical Perspectives  5:287–315.

Real, Leslie A.1991. “Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture. Science  253:980–86.

Robertson, David. 2007. The Dawkins Letters. Challenging Atheist Myths. Fearn , Scotland : Christian Focus.

Rogers, Deborah S., and Paul R.Ehrlich. 2008. “Natural selection and cultural rates of change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA  105:3416–20.

Samarapungavan, Ala, and Reinout W.Wiers. 1997. “Children's thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science  21:147–77.

Semaw, Sileshi. 2000. “The world's oldest stone artefacts from Gona, Ethiopia: Their implications for understanding stone technology and patterns of human evolution between 2.6–1.5 million years ago. Journal of Archaeological Science  27:1197–1214.

Smedes, Taede A.2008. “Beyond Barbour or Back to Basics? The Future of Science‐and‐Religion and the Quest for Unity. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  41:445–64.

Sober, Elliott. 2002. “Intelligent design and probability reasoning. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion  52:65–80.

Swinburne, Richard G.1968. “The argument from design. Philosophy  43:199–212.

Van Fraassen, Bas. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford : Clarendon.

Wallace, Alfred R.1871. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection. London : Macmillan.

Wattles, Jeffrey. 2006. “Teleology Past and Present. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science  41:445–64.

Whiten, A., J.Goodall, W. C.McGrew, T.Nishida, V.Reynolds, Y.Sugiyama, C. E. G.Tutin, R. W.Wrangham, and C.Boesch. 1999. “Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature  399:682–85.