Notes
- . MichaelPolanyi, “Science and Reality, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18(1967):187, 191.
- . Michael Polanyi, Knowing and Being (London: Routledge& Kegan Paul, 1969), p. ix (cf. Daedalus [Spring 19731). The title of the Daedalus issue is “The Search for Knowledge.” Many of the articles discuss the destructive effects the natural science model has had in different disciplines.
- . Michael Polanyi, “Why Did We Destroy Europe?” Studium Generale 23 (1970): 909–16; cf. Alfred North Whitehead, Science and the Modem World (New York: Free Press, 1967).
- . Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post‐Critical Philosophy (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1958), p. 286.
- . Michael Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension (New York: Doubleday& Co., 1966), p. 20.
- . Knowing and Being (n. 2 above), pp. 112—15, 139—40; cf. Tacit Dimension, p. 31.
- . All of Polanyi's writings speak of the structure of tacit knowing. The following sections are specifically devoted to it: Personal Knowledge, pt. 2; Knowing and Being, pt. 3; Tacit Dimension, chap. 1.
- . Michael Polanyi, “The Structure of Tacit Knowing” (lecture, University of Chicago, May 1969), p. 2a.
- . Knowing and Being, p. 120; “The Creative Imagination,” Chemical and Engineering News, April 25, 1966, pp. 88, 92; “Logic and Psychology,” American Psychologist (January 1968), pp. 27–43.
- . Tacit Dimension, p. 4.
- . Ibid., pp. 7–8, for other examples.
- . Ibid., p. 14; Knowing and Being, 142–43, 167.
- . Knowing and Being, pp. 138–58, 194, 212; “Logic and Psychology”(n. 9 above), pp. 31, 39.
- . Knowing and Being, p. 212; “Logic and Psychology,” pp. 29–30.
- . Tacit Dimension, pp. 9–13; “Logic and Psychology,” p. 29.
- . Knowing and Being, pp. 183–85; “Logic and Psychology,” pp. 33–34; Tacit Dimension, pp. 15–18.
- . Knowing and Being, pp. 79, 115, 126, 129; “Logic and Psychology,” pp. 38–40; Tad Dimension, pp. 13–15.
- . Tacit Dimension, pp. 88–89; “Unpublished Transcript of Conversation between Michael Polanyi and Raymond Wilken,” pt. 2, p. 20.
- . “The Creative Imagination”(n. 9 above), p. 91.
- . Michael Polanyi, The Study of Man (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959). p. 96.
- . “Science and Reality”(n. 1 above), p. 195.
- . Personal Knowledge, chap.
- . See the following for more work along these lines: Richard Gelwick, “Theology as a Heuristic Enterprise” (lecture, Consortium for Higher Education Religion Studies, Dayton, Ohio, 1971); William T.Scott, “A Bridge from Science to Religion Based on Polanyi's Theory of Knowledge,” Zygon 5(1970):41–62.
- . Knowing and Being, pp. 54, 82–83; Personal Knowledge, pp. 135–36.
- . Knowing and Being, p. 54.
- . Harry Prosch, “Cooling the Modern Mind: Polanyi's Mission,” Skidmore College Bulletin (August 1971). p. 18; cf. Personal Knowledge, pp. 279–86; Study of Man, pp. 71–99.
- . Michael Polanyi, “Meaning”(lecture, University of Texas, Austin, 197l), pp. 3–4 ff.
- . Michael Polanyi, “Acceptance of Religion”(lecture suppl. no. 4, University of Chicago, May 1969), pp. 6–7.
- . “Meaning,” pp. 4–5.
- . MichaelPolanyi, “What Is a PaintingAmerican Scholar 39(1970):664.
- . Ibid., p. 665.
- . Personal Knowledge, p. 7.
- . “What Is a Painting?” p. 666.
- . “Acceptance of Religion”(n. 28 above), p. 8.
- . “What Is a Painting?” p. 666.
- . “Acceptance of Religion,” p. 11.
- . Tacit Dimension, p. 91.